SS100 Submitted Reviews

:: iSoaker.com Review

Review By Rocky (Posted on 2001/06/10 | Edited by iSoaker.com)

This was my first Super Soaker!

The SS 100 is a good blaster, but I didn't see any difference in the stream-size or water or distance between the SS 100 and the SS 50. One difference though, it is two times heavier than the SS 50. It also looked intimidating and its price was quite intimidating, too. 40 loons! You could buy a Monster with that kinda money!

Yep, Super Soakers weren't cheap back then. If you were to use a SS 100 after using an XP/CPS, etc you'd feel the difference. The blaster feels flimsy. The blaster leaks. The blaster doesn't feel propoerly proportioned. You'd look at the stream-size and distance and see how wimpy it is.

My suggestions are the following.

1. Don't use this blaster for (modern) major outdoor water fights. Use it only if you are fighting people with XP 220s or XP 240s.
2.Don't be fooled by its looks. Just because it has a separate compression tank doesn't mean it could wipeout a CPS.
3. Do carry a backup/sidearm with you. You'd need it.

Although there are many bad aspects about this blaster, there are a few good things about the SS 100. It camouflages pretty well. It's intimidating. And it earns a place in collectors case.

War Journal | Blaster Reviews | Repair Tips | Tips and Tactics | Humour Section | Image Gallery | Links